I haven't yet heard the new Burzum album. I was supposed to get a promo copy but nothing has arrived just yet so I suppose I have been ignored. I am slightly embarassed to admit that I am looking forward to hearing it. The music of Burzum has always struck me as incredibly powerful in its stark, minimal beauty. Yet, like many others that I know, I also find my liking for Burzum difficult given Vikernes's loathsomeness. This isn't of course a problem confined to Burzum - there are loads of revolting artists in history who have created amazing work, Wagner being the most famous example - but it is particularly difficult given the location of Burzum's work in the metal scene.
As I've written at length before, there is a strong tendency in metal to play down or ignore anything that is 'political'. In my book I mentioned a interview with Vikernes conducted in prison and published in Terrorizer in 1996, that didn't discuss his racism or his killing of Euronymous. This month's Terrorizer has Vikernes on the cover and features a longish interview with him inside. It's not as much of a whitewash as the 1996 interview, but it still pulls its punches. There's some discussion of his renaming of the new album from 'The White God' to 'Belos' but little else that really delves properly into his racist beliefs. He doesn't say much about Euronymous either other than to deny his murder was premeditated. The interview seems to be a missed opportunity once again.
There are some in the scene who do loath Vikernes, some for his racism and some for his murder of Euronymous. Dig , founder of Earache Records (who nearly signed Burzum in the early 90s before Vikernes's views became clear) even posted a download link to the new album to try and sabotage it (the copyright implications of which are discussed here).
Part of the problem with Burzum is that the issues surrounding the artist are often reduced to a choice between absolute anti-racist rejectionism and apolitical 'it's only music'-ism. I reject that choice. Burzum's work is simply too interesting musically to be dismissed outright but Vikernes's views are too much a part of his work to be simply ignored. What Burzum requires is active, critical listening that goes alongside an active, critical political imagination.
The issue gets even more complicated when you think through the implications of this: does the practice I suggest apply to all artists? Could Skrewdriver for example be listened to in this way? I would argue that Burzum is much more artistically important than Skrewdriver but pinning down exactly why is very difficult.
Recent Comments